孤高のグルメ☆
Among the many wonderful Japanese restaurants in Japan, why is this restaurant awarded three Michelin stars? Anyone can say "delicious" or "tasty," but when it comes to accurate comparisons, it is probably difficult for ordinary food writers or self-proclaimed gourmets to evaluate this restaurant. This is because without consciously tasting and experiencing various Japanese cuisine restaurants, it is very difficult to notice and compare the differences at this level. Just like how understanding the essence of cutting-edge modern/innovative fusion cuisine is difficult without having consciously eaten classic French or classic Italian cuisine in Europe or Japan. Otherwise, in Kyoto where there are many up-and-coming young restaurants alongside established ones like "Kikunoi," "Wakuden," "Hyotei," "Sasuki," "Ogata," "Kicho," "Mizai," "Maruyama," "Hamasaku," and "Nakahigashi," it would be challenging to express in one's own words why "Maeda" has three stars. This is why there are unusually few reviews on this restaurant's Tabelog page. I believe the uniqueness of Kyoto's "Maeda" is consolidated on the single board of the counter inside the restaurant. The cherry wood, which is close to white wood, darkens in color over time, making it a high-quality wood. When you enter the concrete building's noren, you are greeted by a lithograph of Hiroshi Senju's waterfall, and the interior is luxuriously decorated with straight-grained wood typical of a first-class establishment. The interior has only 8-10 counter seats with no private rooms. The first thing that catches your eye upon entering is likely the single board of the counter. When I first saw this counter, I often thought it was the same high-grade walnut as the one at the Park Hyatt Kyoto's Bar "Kohaku" where I usually stay and watch the sunset until dinner time, but it turned out to be black cherry. Why is it not a white wood counter like other restaurants, such as hinoki, icho, or sen? The details are not certain. Perhaps due to the recent extraordinary price increases in white wood, or is it a deliberate choice? Either way, as a result, this wood serves as an exquisite "deviation" in terms of fashion, enhanced by the lighting, giving the interior a slightly modern impression and increasing the compatibility with the traditional and sometimes modern dishes served by the owner. The meal starts with a blue underglaze pottery dish with only the dishes prepared by Mr. Maeda and his knife inside the counter. Is it intentional to use only this blue underglaze pottery? If so, that strategy is extremely effective. Because the limited color scheme gradually becomes vibrant and colorful with the dishes and beautiful tableware in the space. The style is to thoroughly enjoy the finest seasonal ingredients from all over Japan at that time, such as red snapper, soft-shelled turtle, mackerel, abalone, sea urchin, ayu with roe, crab, wild matsutake mushrooms from Tohoku, wild conger eel, wild eel, wild matsutake mushrooms, etc., in appropriate cooking and portions. This approach of not having a menu like "this dish is the same as that famous restaurant" or "that dish is the same as that" can be seen as originality. And not only the taste but also the quantity and balance of sashimi, grilled dishes, fried dishes, steamed dishes, etc., are beautiful. Since the owner himself seems to be disheartened by the fact that many people judge dishes based on their ears (such as the origin and training place) rather than their own taste buds and eyes, he provides dishes without being overly concerned about whether they are from Kyoto, allowing modern Japanese chefs living in the present era to serve dishes that they genuinely consider delicious if they were to eat these ingredients themselves, without being pretentious or arrogant, in a natural manner. By doing so, these dishes have successfully evolved into a fusion of modern and classic Japanese cuisine. It is said to be from the famous restaurant "Sakuragawa," but even for something as simple as slicing conger eel, it is not just about�