恵ありてこそ
I purchased a bento box from "Kyotoshumi Hishiiwa" for around 5000 yen in Kyoto about 5-6 years ago. When I ate it on the Shinkansen, I felt like I was rejecting all the flavors, thinking, "This tastes more like medicine than food, doesn't it?" Personally, I felt it was too strange to be called food of this world, more like flavors from a phantom realm. Although what I had this time didn't feel as unique, I still found the price of around 5000 yen to be too high for the level of cuisine. On the other hand, even as an amateur, I could sense the high level of skill and precision in Hishiiwa's bento, but I didn't feel the same exceptional skill and precision in our products. I made a reservation and ordered the "Shinno Wakuden Nidan Bento," but taste-wise, it falls short compared to the "Shun-sai Bento" lunch from Gogatsuya in Senju, Tokyo, in my review. Is it because it's a pre-made bento? Is that really the case? Gogatsuya also has plenty of pre-made items. One is 1340 yen, the other is around 5000 yen, with the latter filled with incomprehensible katakana-laden items that make me want to vent my grievances but I hold back. Since it's a bento, is it inevitable to have katakana-laden items? Is it really necessary? How did they manage in the past? I'll only write three things. I don't want to be too involved with this product, so I'll stop here. The layers of the dashimaki tamago are too many and too distinct. It loses its fluffiness. While our product had countless distinct layers, I could only sense 3 layers in Gogatsuya's, both in taste and visually. Taste-wise, ours felt lacking in depth, while Gogatsuya's had a well-balanced sweetness in the Kanto style. Both are pre-made. (I personally feel a sense of unnaturalness in the combination of tamagoyaki and watery grated daikon.) Also, the croquette in this bento was mushy. It couldn't compare to a freshly fried croquette from a butcher shop or a regular homemade one. I will also review Akisaka Dainuma's sea bream at a later time, but it's on a completely different level. By the way, Akisaka Dainuma in Akasaka(!) used to offer a sea bream ochazuke set (now discontinued) for 2500 yen. I'll rewrite the title: "It looks beautiful, but the actual taste is just slightly better than average. There's nothing outstanding in terms of flavor. The value for money is not good at all." I'll add, "Depending on the restaurant, it's better to enjoy the live cooking at the restaurant." I won't provide a more detailed review this time. (I took detailed notes.) If you doubt this review, please try both establishments' dishes blindfolded and decide which one tastes better. I won't be swayed by names or special rules just because it's a bento. I have specific points I want to address, but I will refrain. I trust the Michelin Guide more than the reviews on this website, but I sometimes notice weaknesses in the review system. However, I also have my faults and should have looked more carefully at the pie chart. (I didn't have more time than usual to plan.) I rated the value for money as low as possible at 1.0 (I actually wanted to rate it lower), and I felt 3.3 was a fair rating for taste, so I left it as is. This time, the rating method is exceptional, but the overall rating is calculated by averaging both, resulting in 2.2 for both establishments. The value for money is too low. Even 3000 yen would be too much. About 40 years ago during my student days, I believed in TV and almost all the restaurants except one were a letdown. When the Michelin Guide was published in Japan, I bought various editions for 2-3 years, and while there were good restaurants, there were also quite a few disappointing ones. I had purchased the Nikkei Off Duty in Kyoto and Ginza over 25 years ago, and both were good. Oh well, reputation and ===========